|
|
 |
|
CITIZENS' AGENDA
: STRATEGY 4
|
|
|
Encourage
development patterns that are more compact with a
mix of uses. Target new development along transit
corridors, in downtowns, in regional centers and
town centers, along main streets and at rail and
bus station areas. |
|
Land
use influences how people get from here to there. In many Minnesota
cities, zoning codes prohibit development patterns common 50
years ago when most children walked to school, and people shopped
locally, and rode buses and streetcars. Today’s municipal
codes often mandate development patterns that make it necessary
for residents to drive everywhere for everything. Spread-out
development patterns, with streets that are not well connected,
add to infrastructure costs — for schools, sewer, water,
roads and parking.
 |
Today’s
spread-out development patterns where housing,
jobs, and shopping are all separated has high infrastructure
costs, results in more car trips, more air pollution,
fewer transit trips, and uses up far more land.
Image courtesy of Calthorpe & Assoc. |
^
|
|
<<<
St. Louis Park is creating a
new pedestrian-friendly downtown. When completed,
the $120 million project on Excelsior Boulevard
will include a mix of housing, retail and commercial
uses. Excelsior Boulevard is a major bus route.
Many other cities including Burnsville, Hopkins,
and Coon Rapids are also building or revitalizing
downtowns.
|
|
They also raise the cost of providing transit
service and make walking and bicycling difficult and sometimes
hazardous.
In
2001, a study examined three scenarios for accommodating
the 280,000 new households and 360,000 new jobs expected
in the Twin Cities region over the next 20 years. The options
ranged from continuing today’s spread-out growth patterns
to concentrating development in walkable mixed-use centers
along transit corridors, with a greater diversity of housing
types. The latter option projected infrastructure cost savings
of $3 billion, the least traffic congestion, and the lowest
level of air pollution when compared with the other two options
(7).
|
Footnotes:
7. The Smart Growth Twin Cities Regional Development
Scenarios Report. Calthorpe and
Associates, 2002.
|
|
|